This
chart shows the transmission rate. Russia locked down forcefully
(probably similar to China) and the low point of R0 occurs after our
universal lock date of May 15. To match their actual we have to
postulate 10% additional lockdown (negative 10%) on that date.
Then on June 1 they have a 5% unlock (15% up from their low). |
This
chart shows the mortality
trend. It possibly reflects data being concealed during April,
then added to totals in May and June, which is at least somewhat
acknowledged. Russia, at least the politicians, are gripped by
fear, unable to be honest about people dying. |
This
is the slow-recovery option, putting off cases as long as possible by
maintaining the current status quo. This case was difficult to
construct without a big rebound in winter or spring. It will be
equallty difficult to execute, and I do not think the Russian public
expects to remain so tightly locked in the summer. There will be
few cases, and no support for it. |
This is the moderate-recovery option. It provides nearly 30% economic claw back over full lockdown, which is huge. 5,000 people will die to pay for it. If Russia could grasp the concept of making this voluntary it would work. But I wouldn't bet on it. Putin will see political instability and clamp down earlier than the 11/1 date in this scenario. But it will not work according to our model. The peak in December will either occur, or be pushed into 2021 in spite of heavy vaccination. It's possible to do better with a later re-lock in the fall, but I do not think the government will tolerate the cases peak. This is the first profile I've done that requires significant re-lock. |
This
is the fast-recovery option and will have more people getting sick, but
also more people keeping their retirement savings, jobs and small
businesses, and everything is over at an earlier date. Penalties
change only slightly from moderate
option. This is the best option. |
This
chart is a comparison of economic recovery (on a scale of a percent of
one year lockdown costs, green bars) and cost of the pandemic in direct
deaths* (as a percent of the highest case, dark bars). In
Russia, MODERATE recovery is only slightly better than SLOW, but does
provide some economic relief. By getting a substantial number of
cases out of the way and building immunity, they will attempt to deal
with the severe vulnerability come winter using an aggressive vaccine
strategy. They have two in human trials now, and I expect them to
say hell's bells and administer the vaccine to the public starting in
September. It's like the space race to them. They almost
won the spacr race. Their high risk N1 rocket blew up. They
are again tacking such a risk. Might work this time. *
Deaths scale inverse to case
ratio. Case ratio is not well known. Calculations assume 15. |
SUMMARY: Russia has a high seasonal factor. They will have few cases this summer, and most will be pushed into fall and winter when the case rate is difficult to control because of the high transmission rate of the virus at that lattitude. Russia, and possibly other far-north countries, will have to have some degree of relock, or will have to make aggressive efforts to keep some cases going in the summer. Or, well, pull out a miracle early vaccine or cure. See tradeoff chart at right for additional discussion. Russia
has done well at preventing deaths during the past winter (some say they are lying about it). Now we
get to see whether it was just reactionary, or whether they can
actively manage this pandemic across seasons. This
profile illustrates that one function of a model is to allow you to see
clearly the choices a government has, and follow the action with more
understanding of the invisible obstacles they are swerving around.
Following an epidemic without a set of model predictions for different
cases is like watching a soccer game with moving goals that you can't
see. |
(No contact information will be collected, only general regional information about where responses come from. If you want to contact us, use the contact link on the home page). |